Key v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided October 18, 2023·No. 5:23-cv-00011·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION 5:23-cv-11-MOC

CARLA ELWANDA KEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant. )

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, (Doc. No. 12). Plaintiff indicates that Defendant has stipulated to the motion. Having reviewed the motion, supporting exhibits, and the case file, the Court determines that Plaintiff should be awarded attorney fees under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $3,750.00. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees, (Doc. No. 12) is GRANTED. The Court will award attorney fees in the amount of $3,750.00, and pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), the fee award will first be subject to offset of any debt Plaintiff may owe to the United States. The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the United States. If so, that debt will be satisfied first, and if any funds remain, they will be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel. If the United States Department of the Treasury reports to the Commissioner that the Plaintiff does not owe any debt, the Government will exercise its discretion and honor an assignment of EAJA fees, and pay those fees directly to the Plaintiff’s counsel, Aaron L. Dalton, Chad Brown Law, P.O. Box 786, Statesville, North Carolina 28687. No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed.

Signed: October 18, 2023

orton <. Max O. Cogburn Jr & United States District Judge Felgen

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Key v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D.N.C. 2023).

Key v. Commissioner of Social Security (Key v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)