Key Bank v. Giunta

163 A.D.2d 886

This text of 163 A.D.2d 886 (Key Bank v. Giunta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Key Bank v. Giunta, 163 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff, Key Bank of Western New York, and third-party defendants, Donald Sherris and Alfred Weber, demonstrated their entitlement to summary judgment as a matter of law (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 560-562), and defendants and third-party plaintiffs, Joseph and Xavier Giunta, have failed to show, by evidentiary proof in admissible form, facts sufficient to require a trial on any issue of fact (Zuckerman v City of New York, supra, at 562). Consequently, summary judgment was properly granted. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Law-ton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 A.D.2d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/key-bank-v-giunta-nyappdiv-1990.