Key Bank v. Diamond
This text of 217 A.D.2d 945 (Key Bank v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly limited plaintiff’s recovery to $43,533.07 plus interest on that amount because plaintiff failed to move to increase its ad damnum clause (see, Reid v Weir-Metro Ambulance Serv., 191 AD2d 309, 309-310; 17 E. 80th Realty Corp. v 68th Assocs., 173 AD2d 245, 249; cf., Loomis v Civetta Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18, 23, rearg denied 55 NY2d 801). We have examined the arguments raised by defendant Morris Diamond and conclude that they lack merit. (Appeals from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.—Damages.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 A.D.2d 945, 631 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/key-bank-v-diamond-nyappdiv-1995.