Key Bank of Southeastern v. Pal
110 A.D.2d 686, 489 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48581
Opinion
Special Term properly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in the sum of $166,152.03. It is uncontested that defendants owed plaintiff that sum. Furthermore, the asserted defenses of novation, accord and satisfaction, and equitable estoppel are without merit (see, Fuller v Kemp, 138 NY 231; Donemore Clothing Co. v Shapiro, 202 NYS 258; Cantasano v Courtney, 98 Misc 623; McLaughlin v Gillings, 18 Misc 56). Titone, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Key Bank of Southeastern v. Pal, 110 A.D.2d 686, 489 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 686 (Key Bank of Southeastern v. Pal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fuller v. . Kemp
33 N.E. 1034 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)
McLaughlin v. Gillings
18 Misc. 56 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Cantasano v. Courtney
98 Misc. 623 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)