Key Bank of Southeastern v. Pal
This text of 110 A.D.2d 686 (Key Bank of Southeastern v. Pal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Special Term properly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in the sum of $166,152.03. It is uncontested that defendants owed plaintiff that sum. Furthermore, the asserted defenses of novation, accord and satisfaction, and equitable estoppel are without merit (see, Fuller v Kemp, 138 NY 231; Donemore Clothing Co. v Shapiro, 202 NYS 258; Cantasano v Courtney, 98 Misc 623; McLaughlin v Gillings, 18 Misc 56). Titone, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 A.D.2d 686, 489 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/key-bank-of-southeastern-v-pal-nyappdiv-1985.