Key Appliance, Inc. v. First National City Bank

339 N.E.2d 888, 37 N.Y.2d 826, 377 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2212
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 1975·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of that court. There must be strict compliance with the documentary - requirements of a letter of credit since the issuing bank at once owes independent obligations to its [828]*828customer and to the beneficiary of the letter of credit, and the interests of these two in any given situation may be divergent, if not conflicting.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Key Appliance, Inc. v. First National City Bank, 339 N.E.2d 888, 37 N.Y.2d 826, 377 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2212 (N.Y. 1975).

339 N.E.2d 888 (Key Appliance, Inc. v. First National City Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North American Foreign Trading Corp. v. General Electronics, Ltd.
67 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)