Kewazinga Corp. v. Google LLC
Opinion
brownruanick IAN G. DIBERNARDO The motion to seal is GRANTED. The confidential business [DiBernardo@brownrudnick.com information is of the type previously approved for redactions and the redactions are narrowly tailored. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of September 14, 2022 Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to maintain Dkt. No. 219 under seal, with access limited to the parties listed in the Appendix at Dkt. No. 223, VIA ELECTRONIC FILING and to close the motion at Dkt. No. 217. Honorable Lorna G. Schofield United States District Court Dated: September 20, 2022 Southern District of New York New York, New York 500 Pearl Street LORNA G. SCHOFIEL New York, New York 10007 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Re: Kewazinga Corp. v. Google LLC, Case No. 1:20-cv-1106-LGS (S.D.N.Y.) Request for Permission to Redact Kewazinga’s Opposition to Google’s Letter on Proposed Summary Judgment Dear Honorable Judge Schofield: Plaintiff Kewazinga Corp. (“Kewazinga”) respectfully requests permission to file a redacted version of its concurrently filed Opposition to Defendant Google LLC’s (“Google”) Letter on Proposed Summary Judgment (“Letter”), with an unredacted version to be filed under seal. Kewazinga makes this request pursuant to the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York, The Notice Regarding Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Civil and Criminal Case Files of the Southern District of New York, and Your Honor’s Individual Rule I(D)(3). Kewazinga understands that the Letter may include information which Google has designated as confidential, and that Google may seek to redact. Although Kewazinga cannot demonstrate that the material designated by Google should be kept under seal, Kewazinga does not oppose Google’s position as to those designations. As such, Kewazinga anticipates that Google will file a letter in support of this motion to seal. Specifically, Kewazinga requests an order granting leave to file under seal the portions as listed and identified below: Portion to Be Filed Under Seal Designating Party Highlighted portions in yellow of the Letter at | Google pgs. 1 and 2.
Brown Rudnick LLP | brownrudnick.com | 7 Times Square, New York, NY, 10036 | 1.212.209.4800
| ep Honorable Lorna G. Schofield September 14, 2022 pip) Page2 Pik Dated: September 14, 2022 /s/ Jan G. DiBernardo Ian G. DiBernardo Jason M. Sobel Timothy J. Rousseau Haroon N. Mian Harold S. Laidlaw BROWN RUDNICK LLP 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036 Tel: (212) 209-4800 Fax: (212) 209-4801 idibernardo@brownrudnick.com jsobel@brownrudnick.com □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ trousseau @brownrudnick.com hmian@brownrudnick.com hlaidlaw@brownrudnick.com Timothy K. Gilman Saunak K. Desai Gregory R. Springsted STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 180 Maiden Lane New York, New York 10038 Tel: (212) 806-5400 Fax: (212) 806-6006 tgilman@stroock.com sdesai@stroock.com gspringsted@stroock.com Counsel for Plaintiff Kewazinga Corp.
cc: All Counsel (by ECF Filing)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kewazinga Corp. v. Google LLC (Kewazinga Corp. v. Google LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.