Kewal Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 530 F. App'x 618 (Kewal Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Josué Estrada Calvillo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.2010). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review Calvillo’s challenges to the original agency proceedings in 1995 because this petition is not timely as to those proceedings. See Ma v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 553, 557 n. 6 (9th Cir.2004).
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Calvillo’s untimely motion to reopen because he did not establish changed circumstances in Guatemala to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
530 F. App'x 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kewal-singh-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2013.