Kewal Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

530 F. App'x 618
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 2013
Docket11-73540
StatusUnpublished

This text of 530 F. App'x 618 (Kewal Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kewal Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr., 530 F. App'x 618 (9th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Josué Estrada Calvillo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir.2010). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Calvillo’s challenges to the original agency proceedings in 1995 because this petition is not timely as to those proceedings. See Ma v. Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 553, 557 n. 6 (9th Cir.2004).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Calvillo’s untimely motion to reopen because he did not establish changed circumstances in Guatemala to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kui Rong Ma v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
361 F.3d 553 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Najmabadi v. Holder
597 F.3d 983 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
530 F. App'x 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kewal-singh-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2013.