Kevorkian v. Peter Paul, Inc.

488 A.2d 102, 3 Conn. App. 335, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 857
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedMarch 5, 1985
Docket2210
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 488 A.2d 102 (Kevorkian v. Peter Paul, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kevorkian v. Peter Paul, Inc., 488 A.2d 102, 3 Conn. App. 335, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 857 (Colo. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and we find that the decision of the compensation review division is correct in law. General Statutes § 31-301b. The finding did not include facts found without evidence nor did it fail to include material facts which are admitted or undisputed. Grady v. St. Mary’s Hospital, 179 Conn. 662, 666, 427 A.2d 842 (1980); Wheat v. Red Star Express Lines, 156 Conn. 245, 248, 240 A.2d 859 (1968).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeBarros v. A. L. Singleton
572 A.2d 69 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1990)
Bucko v. City of New London
537 A.2d 1045 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 A.2d 102, 3 Conn. App. 335, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevorkian-v-peter-paul-inc-connappct-1985.