Kevorkian v. Peter Paul, Inc.
This text of 488 A.2d 102 (Kevorkian v. Peter Paul, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and we find that the decision of the compensation review division is correct in law. General Statutes § 31-301b. The finding did not include facts found without evidence nor did it fail to include material facts which are admitted or undisputed. Grady v. St. Mary’s Hospital, 179 Conn. 662, 666, 427 A.2d 842 (1980); Wheat v. Red Star Express Lines, 156 Conn. 245, 248, 240 A.2d 859 (1968).
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 A.2d 102, 3 Conn. App. 335, 1985 Conn. App. LEXIS 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevorkian-v-peter-paul-inc-connappct-1985.