Kevin Wiemken v. Waller County
This text of Kevin Wiemken v. Waller County (Kevin Wiemken v. Waller County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued July 1, 2021
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00628-CV ——————————— KEVIN WIEMKEN, Appellant V. WALLER COUNTY, WALLER-HARRIS EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT NO. 200, AND WALLER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellees
On Appeal from the 506th District Court Waller County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2019-03-8723
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Kevin Wiemken, has appealed from the final judgment signed by
the trial court on August 12, 2019. Wiemken has neither paid nor made arrangements to pay, the fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 37.3(b).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
In connection with his appeal, On September 10, 2019, Wiemken filed an
“Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis” in this Court, seeking to proceed
without payment of costs on appeal. Wiemken’s application, however failed to
include any indication that he filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of
Court Costs with the trial court, that the trial court declared him indigent, or that he
otherwise was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P.
145(a), (b), (d), (f). Accordingly, on October 11, 2019, Wiemken was notified that
this appeal was subject to dismissal if he did not submit written evidence, on or
before November 12, 2019: (1) that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee
for the preparation of the clerk’s record or (2) that otherwise established that he was
exempt from paying the trial court clerk’s fee for preparation of the clerk’s record.
Wiemken did not adequately respond to the Court’s notice.
On January 5, 2021, this Court directed the trial court clerk to prepare,
certify, and file with this Court, without advance payment of costs by appellant, a
clerk’s record on indigence, including any motion, response, or trial court order
regarding appellant’s ability or inability to pay costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a),
(b), (d), (f); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1. On January 15, 2021, the trial court clerk
2 filed the clerk’s record on indigence. Our review of the record does not provide
sufficient evidence that Wiemken established indigence for purposes of court costs.
See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145 (defining “[c]osts” (internal quotations omitted)).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Guerra, and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kevin Wiemken v. Waller County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-wiemken-v-waller-county-texapp-2021.