Kevin Tramell Upkins v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kevin Tramell Upkins v. State

DecidedMarch 21, 2019

DocketA19A1566

StatusPublished

This text of Kevin Tramell Upkins v. State (Kevin Tramell Upkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kevin Tramell Upkins v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 18, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1566. KEVIN TRAMELL UPKINS v. THE STATE.

In February 2010, Kevin Tramell Upkins was convicted by a jury of armed robbery. Upkins filed a timely motion for new trial, which was denied by the trial court in October 2013. Upkins appealed. This court affirmed Upkins’s conviction in an unpublished opinion. Upkins v. State, Case No. A14A1952 (decided March 25, 2015). Then, in November 2018, Upkins filed a pro se motion for new trial. The trial court denied the motion, and Upkins filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Upkins’s second motion for new trial must be construed as an extraordinary motion for new trial because it was filed after the trial court denied his first motion for new trial and eight years after the judgment of conviction. See OCGA § 5-5-41 (b); Jeffcoat v. State, 299 Ga. App. 54, 54 (682 SE2d 131) (2009); see also OCGA § 5-5-40 (a). An appeal from the denial of an extraordinary motion for new trial requires compliance with the discretionary appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6- 35. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 331-332 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). “The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this court cannot accept an appeal not made in compliance therewith.” Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Upkins’s failure to file an application for a discretionary appeal deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/18/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ March 18, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A1566. KEVIN TRAMELL UPKINS v. THE STATE.

In February 2010, Kevin Tramell Upkins was convicted by a jury of armed robbery. Upkins filed a timely motion for new trial, which was denied by the trial court in October 2013. Upkins appealed. This court affirmed Upkins’s conviction in an unpublished opinion. Upkins v. State, Case No. A14A1952 (decided March 25, 2015). Then, in November 2018, Upkins filed a pro se motion for new trial. The trial court denied the motion, and Upkins filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Upkins’s second motion for new trial must be construed as an extraordinary motion for new trial because it was filed after the trial court denied his first motion for new trial and eight years after the judgment of conviction. See OCGA § 5-5-41 (b); Jeffcoat v. State, 299 Ga. App. 54, 54 (682 SE2d 131) (2009); see also OCGA § 5-5-40 (a). An appeal from the denial of an extraordinary motion for new trial requires compliance with the discretionary appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6- 35. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 331-332 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). “The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this court cannot accept an appeal not made in compliance therewith.” Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Upkins’s failure to file an application for a discretionary appeal deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 03/18/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Kevin Tramell Upkins v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-tramell-upkins-v-state-gactapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack