Kevin S. Brown v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company

Fourth Circuit

Kevin S. Brown v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10988, 1995 WL 83722

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 2, 1995

Docket94-2604

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1215 (Kevin S. Brown v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kevin S. Brown v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, 48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10988, 1995 WL 83722 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin S. BROWN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 94-2604.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 2, 1995.

Kevin S. Brown, Appellant pro se. Luther Ellis Justis, Jr., Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment in his employment and benefit discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Brown v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., No. CA-94-2132-Y (D.Md. Dec. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Appellant's motion to expedite is now moot and is denied for that reason

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin S. BROWN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 94-2604.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 2, 1995.

Kevin S. Brown, Appellant pro se. Luther Ellis Justis, Jr., Baltimore Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment in his employment and benefit discrimination action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Brown v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., No. CA-94-2132-Y (D.Md. Dec. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Appellant's motion to expedite is now moot and is denied for that reason

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10988, 1995 WL 83722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-s-brown-v-baltimore-gas-and-electric-company-ca4-1995.