Kevin Runels v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 28, 2022
Docket07-22-00173-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kevin Runels v. the State of Texas (Kevin Runels v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kevin Runels v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-22-00173-CR

KEVIN RUNELS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 364th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-2022-CR-0329, Honorable William R. Eichman II, Presiding

December 28, 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.

Appellant, Kevin Runels, appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled

substance with intent to deliver1 and sentence to forty years’ confinement. Appellant’s

brief was originally due September 19, 2022, but we granted Appellant’s counsel two

extensions to file a brief. By letter of November 30, 2022, we admonished Appellant’s

counsel that failure to file a brief by December 12 would result in the appeal being abated

1 See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.112(f). and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Appellant’s counsel

has not filed a brief or had any further communication with this Court to date.

We, therefore, abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall

determine the following:

(1) whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;

(2) whether Appellant is indigent;

(3) why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;

(4) whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;

(5) whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;

(6) whether new counsel should be appointed; and

(7) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect

Appellant’s brief to be filed.

The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by January 27, 2023.

If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has

been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;

the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly

appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.

2 Should counsel file a brief on or before January 11, 2023, she is directed to

immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not

be required to take any further action.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 481.112
Texas HS § 481.112(f)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kevin Runels v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-runels-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.