Kevin Ray Schrubb, Sr. v. Edward Murray, Director, Virginia Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Kevin Ray Schrubb, Sr. v. Edward Murray, Director, Virginia Corrections

73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4183, 1996 WL 1217

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 2, 1996

Docket95-6159

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 358 (Kevin Ray Schrubb, Sr. v. Edward Murray, Director, Virginia Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kevin Ray Schrubb, Sr. v. Edward Murray, Director, Virginia Corrections, 73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4183, 1996 WL 1217 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin Ray SCHRUBB, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY, Director, Virginia Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-6159.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 2, 1996.

Kevin Ray Schrubb, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Schrubb v. Murray, No. CA-94-180-2 (E.D.Va. Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin Ray SCHRUBB, Sr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY, Director, Virginia Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-6159.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 2, 1996.

Kevin Ray Schrubb, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Schrubb v. Murray, No. CA-94-180-2 (E.D.Va. Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4183, 1996 WL 1217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-ray-schrubb-sr-v-edward-murray-director-virg-ca4-1996.