Kevin Pollins v. Carolyn Colvin

638 F. App'x 575
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 2016
Docket15-2903
StatusUnpublished

This text of 638 F. App'x 575 (Kevin Pollins v. Carolyn Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kevin Pollins v. Carolyn Colvin, 638 F. App'x 575 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Pollins appeals following the district court’s 1 dismissal, for failure to prosecute and to comply with a court order, of his appeal from the denial of supplemental security income. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Pollins’s case without prejudice. See Rodgers v. Curators of Univ. of Mo., 135 F.3d 1216, 1219 (8th Cir.1998) (standard of review); Schooley v. Kennedy, 712 F.2d 372, 374 (8th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (dismissal without prejudice mitigates against finding that court abused its discretion). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schooley v. Kennedy
712 F.2d 372 (Eighth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
638 F. App'x 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-pollins-v-carolyn-colvin-ca8-2016.