Kevin Odell v. the State of Texas
This text of Kevin Odell v. the State of Texas (Kevin Odell v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00839-CR
Kevin ODELL, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022CR5901 Honorable Andrew Carruthers, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 8, 2023
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On September 8, 2023, appellant filed a “Motion to Appeal Decision on Psychological
Evaluation.” A review of the record shows appellant moved for a psychiatric examination on
March 30, 2023. On May 23, 2023, appellant was ordered to submit to an examination for the
purpose of determining his competency to stand trial. On July 21, 2023, the trial court signed an
agreed judgment of competency to stand trial which provides “[c]ounsel for the Defendant and
Counsel for the State agreed that the defendant is presently competent to stand trial,” and the trial
court reviewed the competency evaluation and concluded appellant is “competent to stand trial.” 04-23-00839-CR
Appellant now seeks to appeal the agreed judgment of competency to stand trial. The agreed
judgment of competency to stand trial is not an appealable order. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art.
46B.011 (“Neither the state nor the defendant is entitled to make an interlocutory appeal relating
to a determination or ruling under Article 46B.005.”). We therefore ordered appellant to show
cause in writing no later than October 6, 2023 why this court should not dismiss this appeal for
lack of jurisdiction. We admonished appellant that if he failed to file a timely response, this appeal
may be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has not filed a response.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kevin Odell v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-odell-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.