Kevin Mikel Brashears v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2007
Docket07-07-00240-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kevin Mikel Brashears v. State (Kevin Mikel Brashears v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kevin Mikel Brashears v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

NO.  07-07-0239-CR

       07-07-0240-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

AUGUST 24, 2007

______________________________

KEVIN MIKEL BRASHEARS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 116503-2; 116851-2; HONORABLE PAMELA COOK SIRMON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Kevin Mikel Brashears filed notices of appeal from his convictions of May 15, 2007.  Neither the trial court clerk’s record nor the reporter’s record has been filed.  On June 13, 2007, the trial court granted a motion to withdraw filed by appellant’s appointed counsel.  No other order appointing an attorney has been issued.

Accordingly, we now abate these appeals and remand the causes to the County Court at Law No. 2 of Potter County for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals;

2. whether appellant is indigent; and

3. whether the appellant is entitled to appointed counsel.

Should it be determined appellant wishes to prosecute the appeals, is indigent, and is entitled to an appointed attorney, the trial court shall appoint counsel.  If counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing counsel.  If necessary, the trial court shall issue findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any necessary orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings, conclusions, and orders to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record.  A supplemental record of the hearing, if any, shall also be prepared.  The supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before September 21, 2007.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kevin Mikel Brashears v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-mikel-brashears-v-state-texapp-2007.