Kevin McCray v. Officer Harrell, in His Individual and Official Capacity

Fourth Circuit

Kevin McCray v. Officer Harrell, in His Individual and Official Capacity

73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40417, 1995 WL 756294

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 21, 1995

Docket95-7279

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 358 (Kevin McCray v. Officer Harrell, in His Individual and Official Capacity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kevin McCray v. Officer Harrell, in His Individual and Official Capacity, 73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40417, 1995 WL 756294 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin McCRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OFFICER HARRELL, in his individual and official capacity,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7279.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: December 21, 1995.

Kevin McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L. Hunter Limbaugh, Robert Thomas King, Willcox, McLeod, Buyck, Baker & Williams, P.A., Florence, SC, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Harrell, No. CA-94-2338-6-3AK (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Kevin McCRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OFFICER HARRELL, in his individual and official capacity,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-7279.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 14, 1995.
Decided: December 21, 1995.

Kevin McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Wilson Buyck, Jr., L. Hunter Limbaugh, Robert Thomas King, Willcox, McLeod, Buyck, Baker & Williams, P.A., Florence, SC, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Harrell, No. CA-94-2338-6-3AK (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F.3d 358, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40417, 1995 WL 756294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-mccray-v-officer-harrell-in-his-individual-a-ca4-1995.