Kevin Mark Bowles v. T.N. Nance, Judge of the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia
This text of 904 F.2d 699 (Kevin Mark Bowles v. T.N. Nance, Judge of the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
904 F.2d 699
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kevin Mark BOWLES, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
T.N. NANCE, Judge of the Circuit Court of the City of
Richmond; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-6761.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 7, 1990.
Decided: May 22, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Aug. 14, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-844-R).
Kevin Mark Bowles, appellant pro se.
Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Mark Bowles seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bowles v. Nance, C/A No. 88-844-R (E.D.Va. July 31, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
904 F.2d 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-mark-bowles-v-tn-nance-judge-of-the-circuit-court-of-the-city-of-ca4-1990.