Kevin Leland Davis v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 19, 2017
Docket04-17-00236-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kevin Leland Davis v. State (Kevin Leland Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kevin Leland Davis v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 19, 2017

No. 04-17-00236-CR

Kevin Leland DAVIS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR10897 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal was due June 9, 2017, but it was not filed. On June 14, this court notified Mary Beth Sasala that she is the court reporter responsible for timely filing the reporter’s record and the record had not been filed. Our notice required Sasala to file the record no later than July 14, 2017, unless appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record and is not entitled to the record without paying the fee, in which case Sasala was required to file a notice so advising the court no later than June 24. To date, we have received no response to our letter.

We order Mary Beth Sasala to file the record in this court on or before July 26, 2017. Sasala is advised that the court will not grant a further extension of time unless she (1) establishes there are extraordinary circumstances that prevent her from timely filing the record, (2) advises the court of what efforts have been expended to prepare the record and the status of completion, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance the record will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. Sasala is further advised that if the record or a conforming motion is not received by the date ordered, we may order her to appear and show cause why she should not be held in contempt.

We further order the clerk of this court to serve this order on Mary Beth Sasala by certified mail, return receipt requested, and by first class United States mail. Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed,” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c), we also order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of July, 2017.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada Chief Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kevin Leland Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-leland-davis-v-state-texapp-2017.