Kevin Lee Buhl v. State
This text of Kevin Lee Buhl v. State (Kevin Lee Buhl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-20-00088-CV
KEVIN LEE BUHL, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 1995-379-C2
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this proceeding, appellant Kevin Lee Buhl, a prison inmate, complains that he
did not receive notice and the opportunity to be heard before the trial court rendered an
order directing the withholding of funds from Buhl's inmate account. The Supreme Court
of Texas has held that the notice and opportunity to complain about the order after it has
been rendered is adequate under the circumstances. See Harrell v. State, 286 S.W. 3d 315,
321 (Tex. 2007) (“an inmate is entitled to notice just as happened here (via copy of the
order, or other notification, from the trial court) and an opportunity to be heard just as happened here (via motion made by the inmate)--but neither need occur before the funds
are withdrawn.”). Appellant's sole issue on appeal is overruled, and the trial court's
order is affirmed.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Neill, and Justice Scoggins 1 Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed March 3, 2021 Do not publish [CV06]
1 The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
Buhl v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kevin Lee Buhl v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-lee-buhl-v-state-texapp-2021.