Kevin Lavell Carter v. Firestone

Eighth Circuit

Kevin Lavell Carter v. Firestone

242 F. App'x 375

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 20, 2007

Docket06-2278

StatusUnpublished

This text of 242 F. App'x 375 (Kevin Lavell Carter v. Firestone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kevin Lavell Carter v. Firestone, 242 F. App'x 375 (8th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Lavell Carter appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his Title VII complaint against BFS Retail & Commercial Operations, LLC. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Carter’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See MM&S Fin., Inc. v. Nat’l Ass’n of Sec. Dealers, Inc., 364 F.3d 908, 909 (8th Cir.2004) (de novo standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Lavell Carter appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of his Title VII complaint against BFS Retail & Commercial Operations, LLC. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Carter’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See MM&S Fin., Inc. v. Nat’l Ass’n of Sec. Dealers, Inc., 364 F.3d 908, 909 (8th Cir.2004) (de novo standard of review). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 F. App'x 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-lavell-carter-v-firestone-ca8-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack