Kevin Lamont McCuin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 7, 2016·No. 08-10-00108-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS §

KEVIN LAMONT MCCUIN, § No. 08-10-00108-CR

Appellant, § Appeal from the

v. § Criminal District Court No. 1

THE STATE OF TEXAS, § of Tarrant County, Texas

State. § (TC# 1139278D)

§ ORDER

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s Motion for Records Without Charge. The mandate issued in the above-styled and numbered cause on July 23, 2012. Appellant states in his motion that he needs the record to prepare a habeas corpus petition. An indigent criminal defendant is not entitled —either as a matter of equal protection or due process—to obtain a copy of the appellate record in order to assist in preparation of a petition for writ of habeas corpus absent a showing that the habeas corpus action is not frivolous and there is a specific need for the records which are sought. United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317, 323-26, 96 S.Ct. 2086, 2090–92, 48 L.Ed.2d 666 (1976); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 693 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); Escobar v. State, 880 S.W.2d 782, 783 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1993, order). Appellant has failed to make this showing. The motion is DENIED. . IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of October, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kevin Lamont McCuin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Kevin Lamont McCuin v. State (Kevin Lamont McCuin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. MacCollom
426 U.S. 317 (Supreme Court, 1976)
In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Escobar v. State
880 S.W.2d 782 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)