Kevin Lamar Johnson v. State
This text of Kevin Lamar Johnson v. State (Kevin Lamar Johnson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00750-CR
Kevin Lamar JOHNSON, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2002CR4779 Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 31, 2018
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
In the matter underlying this appeal, Appellant Kevin Lamar Johnson was convicted of
aggravated robbery and, on November 6, 2002, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. In 2015,
Appellant filed a motion for DNA testing, he appeared at the hearing, and the trial court denied his
motion on August 14, 2015. More than two years later, Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, and his untimely notice of
appeal did not invoke this court’s jurisdiction, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. 04-17-00750-CR
BACKGROUND
On July 24, 2002, Appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery of an elderly person
causing bodily injury. Appellant was tried by jury and convicted of aggravated robbery (repeater)
on November 6, 2002, was fined $10,000.00, and was sentenced to imprisonment for life in the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice—Institutional Division.
On June 5, 2015, at Appellant’s request, the trial court appointed counsel to represent
Appellant in his DNA motion, and counsel filed a motion. Counsel and Appellant appeared in
person at the hearing on the motion—and the trial court denied the motion in open court on August
14, 2015. Appellant did not file a motion to reconsider the order, a motion for new trial, or any
other post-decision pleading pertaining to the trial court’s August 14, 2015 order—until Appellant
filed a notice of appeal on November 9, 2017. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel
concedes Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely.
LATE NOTICE OF APPEAL
A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Olivo v.
State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on
September 14, 2015, see TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, or his notice of appeal and a motion for extension
of time to file the notice of appeal were due not later than September 28, 2015, see id. R. 26.3.
Appellant’s November 9, 2017 notice of appeal was not timely filed and did not invoke
this court’s appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. We
dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522; see also Ater v. Eighth
Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
-2- 04-17-00750-CR
Appellant’s January 4, 2018 pro se motion to represent himself in this appeal is moot.
Because we lack jurisdiction, we do not consider Appellant’s January 17, 2018 pro se brief.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kevin Lamar Johnson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-lamar-johnson-v-state-texapp-2018.