Kevin Lamar Brown v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 20, 2019·No. 19-0494·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D19-494 _____________________________

KEVIN LAMAR BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. W. Joel Boles, Judge.

September 20, 2019

PER CURIAM. Appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus raises claims that, if properly treated as a motion for postconviction relief, are untimely and successive, and is therefore frivolous and an abuse of the postconviction process. We affirm the lower court’s denial of the motion, and we direct the Clerk to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the Department of Corrections for potential disciplinary action against Appellant. See Ponton v. Willis, 172 So. 3d 574, 576-77 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Kevin Lamar Brown, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kevin Lamar Brown v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Kevin Lamar Brown v. State of Florida (Kevin Lamar Brown v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ponton v. Willis
172 So. 3d 574 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)