Kevin Lamar Brown v. State of Florida
This text of Kevin Lamar Brown v. State of Florida (Kevin Lamar Brown v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D19-494 _____________________________
KEVIN LAMAR BROWN,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. W. Joel Boles, Judge.
September 20, 2019
PER CURIAM. Appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus raises claims that, if properly treated as a motion for postconviction relief, are untimely and successive, and is therefore frivolous and an abuse of the postconviction process. We affirm the lower court’s denial of the motion, and we direct the Clerk to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the Department of Corrections for potential disciplinary action against Appellant. See Ponton v. Willis, 172 So. 3d 574, 576-77 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). AFFIRMED. B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Kevin Lamar Brown, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kevin Lamar Brown v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-lamar-brown-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.