Kevin King v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 21, 2010·No. 13-10-00160-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00639-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

DANIEL COLMENERO, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Daniel Colmenero, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 21st day of December, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kevin King v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Kevin King v. State (Kevin King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.