Kevin King v. State
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00639-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
DANIEL COLMENERO, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Daniel Colmenero, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to
dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss
pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having
dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 21st day of December, 2010.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kevin King v. State (Kevin King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.