Kevin Kamper v. State
This text of Kevin Kamper v. State (Kevin Kamper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _____________________ _____
09-18-00267-CR 09-18-00268-CR __________________________
Kevin Kamper, Appellant V. The State of Texas, Appellee
_________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 252nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 16-26420 and 16-26421 _________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Appellant’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief
concluding that the instant appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel certified that counsel provided copies of
the motion and brief to Appellant, advised Appellant of Appellant’s right to
examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied Appellant
with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, 436
S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant requested access to the appellate record with this Court. We
hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to provide access to a paper copy of the
reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification
to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on
or before Friday, January 18, 2019. See id., 436 S.W.3d at 321-22.
ORDER ENTERED January 8, 2019.
PER CURIAM
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kevin Kamper v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-kamper-v-state-texapp-2019.