Kevin Jones v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 8, 2022
Docket05-19-01120-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kevin Jones v. the State of Texas (Kevin Jones v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kevin Jones v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,573-01

EX PARTE KEVIN JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. W401-80295-2018-HC IN THE 401ST DISTRICT COURT FROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam. KELLER , P.J., and SLAUGHTER , J., dissented.

OPINION

Applicant was charged with one count of continuous sexual abuse of a young child and one

count of indecency with a child by contact. He was acquitted of continuous sexual abuse, but

convicted of one count of indecency with a child by contact and sentenced to four years’

imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Jones v. State, No. 05-19-

01120-CR (Tex. App. — Dallas June 11, 2020) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective because counsel

failed to request a unanimity instruction in the jury charge. The State presented evidence of multiple 2

incidents that could have been used to prove indecency with a child by contact. However, the charge

in this case did not include an instruction to tell the jurors that they must be unanimous as to which

incident they believed occurred beyond a reasonable doubt. The trial court conducted a live habeas

hearing and heard testimony and arguments. Based on the record, the trial court has determined that

trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that Applicant was prejudiced.

Relief is granted. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). The judgment in cause

number 401-80295-2018 in the 401st District Court of Collin County is set aside, and Applicant is

remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Collin County to answer the charges as set out in the

indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within ten days from the date of

this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: December 7, 2022 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kevin Jones v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-jones-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.