Kevin James McLean v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 21, 2025
Docket03-25-00593-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kevin James McLean v. the State of Texas (Kevin James McLean v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kevin James McLean v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-25-00593-CR

Kevin James McLean, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 453RD DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-22-3208-E, THE HONORABLE SHERRI TIBBE, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Kevin James McLean pleaded guilty to six counts of the offense of

possession of child pornography and was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment for each count,

with the sentences to run consecutively. McLean has filed a notice of appeal from his judgments

of conviction. However, the trial court’s certification of McLean’s right of appeal is unclear as

to whether he has a right to appeal those judgments. In the certification, the trial court appears to

have initially checked the box next to the statement that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the

defendant has NO right of appeal,” but it also appears to have subsequently scratched out that

check mark. The trial court did not check any other box on the certification.

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for entry

of an amended certification clarifying McLean’s right of appeal, if any. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(f) (providing for amended certification to be filed in appellate court); 34.5(c) (providing for supplementation of appellate record with certification); 37.1 (providing that if certification in

criminal case is defective, appellate court “must notify the parties of the defect so that it can be

remedied, if possible”); 44.4(a) (providing that appellate court “must not” dismiss appeal if “trial

court’s erroneous action . . . prevents the proper presentation of a case to the court of appeals;

and the trial court can correct its action”), (b) (providing that “[i]f the circumstances described in

[Rule 44.4](a) exist, the court of appeals must direct the trial court to correct the error” and “will

then proceed as if the erroneous action . . . had not occurred”). A supplemental clerk’s record

containing the amended certification shall be forwarded to this Court within fifteen days of the

date reflected in this order.

It is so ordered on August 21, 2025.

Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Theofanis

Abated and Remanded

Filed: August 21, 2025

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kevin James McLean v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-james-mclean-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.