Kevin James McLean v. the State of Texas
This text of Kevin James McLean v. the State of Texas (Kevin James McLean v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00593-CR
Kevin James McLean, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 453RD DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-22-3208-E, THE HONORABLE SHERRI TIBBE, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Kevin James McLean pleaded guilty to six counts of the offense of
possession of child pornography and was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment for each count,
with the sentences to run consecutively. McLean has filed a notice of appeal from his judgments
of conviction. However, the trial court’s certification of McLean’s right of appeal is unclear as
to whether he has a right to appeal those judgments. In the certification, the trial court appears to
have initially checked the box next to the statement that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the
defendant has NO right of appeal,” but it also appears to have subsequently scratched out that
check mark. The trial court did not check any other box on the certification.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for entry
of an amended certification clarifying McLean’s right of appeal, if any. See Tex. R. App. P.
25.2(f) (providing for amended certification to be filed in appellate court); 34.5(c) (providing for supplementation of appellate record with certification); 37.1 (providing that if certification in
criminal case is defective, appellate court “must notify the parties of the defect so that it can be
remedied, if possible”); 44.4(a) (providing that appellate court “must not” dismiss appeal if “trial
court’s erroneous action . . . prevents the proper presentation of a case to the court of appeals;
and the trial court can correct its action”), (b) (providing that “[i]f the circumstances described in
[Rule 44.4](a) exist, the court of appeals must direct the trial court to correct the error” and “will
then proceed as if the erroneous action . . . had not occurred”). A supplemental clerk’s record
containing the amended certification shall be forwarded to this Court within fifteen days of the
date reflected in this order.
It is so ordered on August 21, 2025.
Before Justices Triana, Kelly, and Theofanis
Abated and Remanded
Filed: August 21, 2025
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kevin James McLean v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-james-mclean-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.