Kevin Goodwin Wilgis v. Richard Lanham, Sr. Ronald F. Moats Director of Health and Mental Services Assistant Commissioner, Bureau of Field Services
This text of 23 F.3d 404 (Kevin Goodwin Wilgis v. Richard Lanham, Sr. Ronald F. Moats Director of Health and Mental Services Assistant Commissioner, Bureau of Field Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
23 F.3d 404
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kevin Goodwin WILGIS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Richard LANHAM, Sr.; Ronald F. Moats; Director of Health
and Mental Services; Assistant Commissioner,
Bureau of Field Services, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6249.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 1994
Decided: May 23, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-93-3607-S).
Kevin Goodwin Wilgis, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilgis v. Lanham, No. CA-93-3607-S (D. Md. Feb. 24, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 F.3d 404, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18613, 1994 WL 199577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-goodwin-wilgis-v-richard-lanham-sr-ronald-f--ca4-1994.