Kevin F. MacMillan v. Town of Conway

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedMarch 22, 2023
Docket2022-0489
StatusUnpublished

This text of Kevin F. MacMillan v. Town of Conway (Kevin F. MacMillan v. Town of Conway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kevin F. MacMillan v. Town of Conway, (N.H. 2023).

Opinion

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

SUPREME COURT

In Case No. 2022-0489, Kevin F. MacMillan v. Town of Conway, the court on March 22, 2023, issued the following order:

On February 2, 2023, the plaintiff filed several photographs, and on February 14, February 15, March 7, and March 20, 2023, he filed a number of other documents. The plaintiff improperly submitted all of these documents after the deadline for him to have submitted his appendix had passed. See Sup. Ct. R. 13(3). Accordingly, the court will not consider the documents in resolving the appeal, and the partially-assented-to motion filed by Vertex Towers, LLC to strike the photographs is moot.

The court has reviewed the written arguments and the record submitted on appeal, and has determined to resolve the case by way of this order. See Sup. Ct. R. 20(2). The plaintiff, Kevin F. MacMillan, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Ignatius, J.) upholding a decision of the zoning board of adjustment for the defendant, the Town of Conway, to grant a special exception to Vertex Towers, LLC, that would allow the installation of a wireless communications tower exceeding a particular height. The plaintiff argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s decision. We note that the trial court properly declined to consider issues not raised in the plaintiff’s motion for rehearing before the zoning board of adjustment; nor will we consider such issues on appeal. See RSA 677:3, I (2016); Robinson v. Town of Hudson, 154 N.H. 563, 567-68 (2006). Based upon our review of the briefs, the relevant law, the record on appeal, and the trial court’s thorough and well- reasoned decision, we find the plaintiff’s arguments unpersuasive, and affirm the trial court’s decision.

Affirmed.

MacDonald, C.J., and Hicks, Bassett, Hantz Marconi, and Donovan, JJ., concurred.

Timothy A. Gudas, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Town of Hudson
914 A.2d 239 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kevin F. MacMillan v. Town of Conway, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-f-macmillan-v-town-of-conway-nh-2023.