Kevin Alexander Hernandez v. State
This text of Kevin Alexander Hernandez v. State (Kevin Alexander Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-19-00161-CR
KEVIN ALEXANDER HERNANDEZ, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 361st District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-03350-CRF-361
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 10, 2019, Kevin Hernandez filed a notice of appeal of his conviction for
continuous sexual abuse of a child. Hernandez’s imposition of sentence was on April 5,
2019. Hernandez’s notice of appeal is therefore untimely, and we have no jurisdiction of
an untimely appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.
Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice of appeal is untimely).
Furthermore, because the trial court’s certification of his right of appeal, which
Hernandez and his counsel signed, indicates that Hernandez has waived his right of appeal, this appeal must be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d) (“The appeal must be
dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been
made part of the record under these rules.”); Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2003) (waiver of appeal).
Notwithstanding that we are dismissing this appeal, Hernandez may file a motion
for rehearing with this Court within 15 days after this opinion and judgment are rendered
if he believes this opinion and judgment are erroneously based on inaccurate information
or documents. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. Moreover, if Hernandez desires to have the
opinion and judgment of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review,
that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either
the day this Court’s judgment is rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing
is overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a).
For the reasons stated, this appeal is dismissed.
REX D. DAVIS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed May 22, 2019 Do not publish [CRPM]
Hernandez v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kevin Alexander Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-alexander-hernandez-v-state-texapp-2019.