Kevin Alejandro Ramos v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 13, 2021
Docket10-21-00262-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kevin Alejandro Ramos v. the State of Texas (Kevin Alejandro Ramos v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kevin Alejandro Ramos v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00262-CR

KEVIN ALEJANDRO RAMOS, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 19-03385-CRF-272

ABATEMENT ORDER

Kevin Alejandro Ramos has attempted to appeal his convictions for aggravated

robbery and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. See TEX. PENAL CODE §§ 29.03;

22.02(A)(2). The trial court's certification of the right of appeal 1 indicates Ramos has

waived his right to appeal; thus, this appeal must be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d)

("The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right

1 Ramos signed the certification for Count One along with his counsel; only his counsel signed the certification for Count Two. Both certifications indicate Ramos waived his right to appeal. of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules."); Monreal v. State, 99

S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (waiver of appeal).

However, the certification of the right of appeal also indicates that “this criminal

case: Is not a plea bargain case, and the defendant has the right to appeal.” Due to this

conflict within the certification, it appears to be defective and must be corrected. See Dears

v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614-615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, we ABATE this proceeding to the trial court so that a corrected

certification of the right of appeal may be prepared by the trial court. If the defendant

has the right of appeal, the corrected certification of the right of appeal does not need to

be signed by counsel or the defendant. The corrected certification must be signed by the

trial court within 14 days from the date of this Order and provided to the trial court clerk.

The trial court clerk is ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing

the corrected certification of the right of appeal within 7 days after the corrected

certification is signed by the trial court and delivered to the trial court clerk.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Appeal abated Order issued and filed October 13, 2021 [RWR]

Ramos v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Monreal v. State
99 S.W.3d 615 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kevin Alejandro Ramos v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-alejandro-ramos-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2021.