Kever v. McDonough

927 So. 2d 228, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6536, 2006 WL 1152677
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 2006·No. No. 1D05-4137·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of respondent’s concession of error, the lower tribunal’s order denying the petition for writ of mandamus is quashed. Respondent’s motion for remand is granted and this matter is remanded to the circuit court for consideration of petitioner’s reply. See Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

WEBSTER, DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kever v. McDonough, 927 So. 2d 228, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6536, 2006 WL 1152677 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

927 So. 2d 228 (Kever v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. State
927 So. 2d 228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)