Keveney v. Magone
This text of 42 F. 491 (Keveney v. Magone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(orally.) I am unable to concur in the views of the plaintiffs’ counsel as to the phraseology “cork bark, manufactured.” I think there must be some intention of congress to discriminate and differentiate between the expression “manufactures of cork,” and the phrase [493]*493“cork bark, manufactured.” Therefore, on the testimony of this case as it stands, touching the manufacture of this article, I am unable to accede to the proposition that it is covered by the 422d paragraph of the tariff act, and I shall therefore direct a verdict for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 F. 491, 1890 U.S. App. LEXIS 2193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keveney-v-magone-circtsdny-1890.