Keve & Young v. United States

12 Ct. Cust. 103, 1924 WL 26653, 1924 CCPA LEXIS 14
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals·Decided February 9, 1924·No. No. 2231·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bland, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Certain auto plate junior matrixes were imported from Germany and entered on September 16, 1921. Final appraisement was on October 18, 1922, after the passage of the tariff act of September 21, 1922. The appraisal of the merchandise was in excess of the entered value, and the importer filed with the Board of General Appraisers his petition for remission of additional duties as provided for in section 489 of the law of 1922. The Government moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the law of 1922 did not apply and [104] that the board had no jurisdiction to hear the petition. The petition was dismissed. Upon the authority of Wm. A. Brown & Co. et al. v. United States (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 93; T. D. 40026), decided concurrently herewith, the motion of the Government to dismiss is overruled and the judgment of the Board of General Appraisers is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keve & Young v. United States, 12 Ct. Cust. 103, 1924 WL 26653, 1924 CCPA LEXIS 14 (ccpa 1924).

12 Ct. Cust. 103 (Keve & Young v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

May Co. v. United States
12 Ct. Cust. 266 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)
Penick & Ford Ltd. v. United States
12 Ct. Cust. 218 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)