Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Keuhner v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Keuhner v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

88 N.Y.S. 1055
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 23, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.Y.S. 1055 (Keuhner v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keuhner v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 88 N.Y.S. 1055 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The case presents nothing more than the usual conflict of evidence in such cases. It was fairly submitted to the jury, and no reason appears why their verdict should be disturbed. The defendant having duly excepted to the granting of the extra allowance, the judgment must be modified by deducting the allowance. Standard Trust Company v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 178 N. Y. 407, 70 N. E. 925.

Since the error in granting the allowance does not affect the merits, the judgment as modified will be affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Standard T. Co. v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.
70 N.E. 925 (New York Court of Appeals, 1904)
Monroe v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
79 A.D. 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Monroe v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
80 N.Y.S. 177 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 N.Y.S. 1055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keuhner-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1904.