Ketwon Westmoreland v. Warden, Johnson SP

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 12, 2024·No. 24-13571·Unpublished

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

No. 24-13571

Non-Argument Calendar

KETWON WESTMORELAND, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus WARDEN, JOHNSON SP

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-02465-LMM

2 Opinion of the Court 24-13571

Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Ketwon Westmoreland, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s July 14, 2023, final judgment dismissing this action. However, the operative notice of appeal, which is deemed filed on October 22, 2024, under the prison mailbox rule, is untimely to appeal that judgment. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c)(1), 26(a)(1); Jeffries v. United States, 748 F.3d 1310, 1314 (11th Cir. 2014). There is no basis in the record for relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (a)(6); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(c); Sanders v. United States, 113 F.3d 184, 187 (11th Cir. 1997).

All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ketwon Westmoreland v. Warden, Johnson SP, (11th Cir. 2024).

Ketwon Westmoreland v. Warden, Johnson SP (Ketwon Westmoreland v. Warden, Johnson SP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. Drug Enforcement Administration
606 F.3d 1296 (Eleventh Circuit, 2010)
Tyrone Glen Sanders v. United States
113 F.3d 184 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Marlandow Jeffries v. United States
748 F.3d 1310 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)