Ketterer v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY/FARMER JACK/BORMAN'S, INC.
744 N.W.2d 162, 480 Mich. 1077, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 348
This text of 744 N.W.2d 162 (Ketterer v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY/FARMER JACK/BORMAN'S, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ketterer v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY/FARMER JACK/BORMAN'S, INC., 744 N.W.2d 162, 480 Mich. 1077, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 348 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
Chrisinda KETTERER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY/FARMER JACK/BORMAN'S, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
744 N.W.2d 162, 480 Mich. 1077, 2008 Mich. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketterer-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-companyfarme-mich-2008.