Kettenburg v. Geico Insurance
This text of 538 F. App'x 366 (Kettenburg v. Geico Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Christopher Kettenburg appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kettenburg v. GEICO Ins., No. 8:13-cv-01644-PJM (D. Md. June 19, 2013). We deny Kettenburg’s motion for waiver of service. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
538 F. App'x 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kettenburg-v-geico-insurance-ca4-2013.