Kettenburg v. Geico Insurance

Fourth Circuit

Kettenburg v. Geico Insurance

538 F. App'x 366

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2013·No. No. 13-1861·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Christopher Kettenburg appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kettenburg v. GEICO Ins., No. 8:13-cv-01644-PJM (D. Md. June 19, 2013). We deny Kettenburg’s motion for waiver of service. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert Christopher Kettenburg appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kettenburg v. GEICO Ins., No. 8:13-cv-01644-PJM (D. Md. June 19, 2013). We deny Kettenburg’s motion for waiver of service. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Kettenburg v. Geico Insurance, 538 F. App'x 366 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

538 F. App'x 366 (Kettenburg v. Geico Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.