Ketover v. Freedman

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Ketover v. Freedman

11 R.I. Dec. 43

CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island

DecidedFebruary 17, 1934

DocketNo. 90874

StatusPublished

This text of 11 R.I. Dec. 43 (Ketover v. Freedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ketover v. Freedman, 11 R.I. Dec. 43 (R.I. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

CARPENTER, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the breach of a ■ contract to sell and deliver certain waste. The case -was tried before a jury and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $870.32.

The defendant filed a motion for a new trial, alleging the usual grounds, and the matter is now before this Court upon said motion.

For plaintiff: Morris E. Yaraus. For defendant: Robinson & Robinson.

After careful consideration of the evidence in this case, this Court is not satisfied that substantial justice has been done.

Motion for a new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CARPENTER, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the breach of a ■ contract to sell and deliver certain waste. The case -was tried before a jury and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $870.32.

The defendant filed a motion for a new trial, alleging the usual grounds, and the matter is now before this Court upon said motion.

For plaintiff: Morris E. Yaraus. For defendant: Robinson & Robinson.

After careful consideration of the evidence in this case, this Court is not satisfied that substantial justice has been done.

Motion for a new trial granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 R.I. Dec. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketover-v-freedman-risuperct-1934.