Ketema v. Midwest Stamping, Inc.

87 F. App'x 905
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2004·No. No. 03-2251·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mesfin Ketema seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying Ketema’s motions for sanctions, removal of the magis[906] trate judge and subpoenas. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Ketema seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appeal-able interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny all of Ketema’s pending motions, including his motions for an injunction, to join parties, to expedite, to join claims, and for en banc review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ketema v. Midwest Stamping, Inc., 87 F. App'x 905 (4th Cir. 2004).

87 F. App'x 905 (Ketema v. Midwest Stamping, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)