Ketema v. Midwest Stamping, Inc.

87 F. App'x 905
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2004
DocketNo. 03-2251
StatusPublished

This text of 87 F. App'x 905 (Ketema v. Midwest Stamping, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ketema v. Midwest Stamping, Inc., 87 F. App'x 905 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mesfin Ketema seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying Ketema’s motions for sanctions, removal of the magis[906]*906trate judge and subpoenas. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Ketema seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appeal-able interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny all of Ketema’s pending motions, including his motions for an injunction, to join parties, to expedite, to join claims, and for en banc review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 F. App'x 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketema-v-midwest-stamping-inc-ca4-2004.