Ketchum v. Verdell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Ketchum v. Verdell

42 Ga. 534

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1871

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 42 Ga. 534 (Ketchum v. Verdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ketchum v. Verdell, 42 Ga. 534 (Ga. 1871).

Pincite

Opinions

Warner, J.

The charge of the Court to the jury, “ That it was doubtful whether the order of the defendant made Tate his agent to purchase the corn,” was error, under the provisions of the 3183d section of the Code. According to the evidence in the case, as disclosed by the record, the Court should have charged the jury as to the ratification, by defendant, of the sale of the corn, by plaintiff to the defendant.

Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.

Lochbane, C. J., concurred, he said, for different reasons, but furnished no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warner, J.

The charge of the Court to the jury, “ That it was doubtful whether the order of the defendant made Tate his agent to purchase the corn,” was error, under the provisions of the 3183d section of the Code. According to the evidence in the case, as disclosed by the record, the Court should have charged the jury as to the ratification, by defendant, of the sale of the corn, by plaintiff to the defendant.

Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.

Lochbane, C. J., concurred, he said, for different reasons, but furnished no opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Ga. 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketchum-v-verdell-ga-1871.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack