Ketchum v. Driggs

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Ketchum v. Driggs

14 F. Cas. 413, 6 McLean 13

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan·Decided June 15, 1853·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is a bill praying an injunction, to which a demurrer was filed. The demurrer of course must be decided, before a motion for the injunction can be heard. There is no sufficient averment of the citizenship of the complainant, and this being apparent on the face of the bill, the demurrer is sustained. Leave was given to amend the bill.

THE COURT gave time to the defendants [Driggs & Cargill] to put in a voluntary, answer, and to file affidavits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is a bill praying an injunction, to which a demurrer was filed. The demurrer of course must be decided, before a motion for the injunction can be heard. There is no sufficient averment of the citizenship of the complainant, and this being apparent on the face of the bill, the demurrer is sustained. Leave was given to amend the bill.

THE COURT gave time to the defendants [Driggs & Cargill] to put in a voluntary, answer, and to file affidavits.

Ketchum v. Driggs, 14 F. Cas. 413, 6 McLean 13 (circtdmi 1853).

Pincite

14 F. Cas. 413 (Ketchum v. Driggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.