Ketchum v. Driggs

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Ketchum v. Driggs

14 F. Cas. 413, 6 McLean 13

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

DecidedJune 15, 1853

StatusPublished

This text of 14 F. Cas. 413 (Ketchum v. Driggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ketchum v. Driggs, 14 F. Cas. 413, 6 McLean 13 (circtdmi 1853).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is a bill praying an injunction, to which a demurrer was filed. The demurrer of course must be decided, before a motion for the injunction can be heard. There is no sufficient averment of the citizenship of the complainant, and this being apparent on the face of the bill, the demurrer is sustained. Leave was given to amend the bill.

THE COURT gave time to the defendants [Driggs & Cargill] to put in a voluntary, answer, and to file affidavits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is a bill praying an injunction, to which a demurrer was filed. The demurrer of course must be decided, before a motion for the injunction can be heard. There is no sufficient averment of the citizenship of the complainant, and this being apparent on the face of the bill, the demurrer is sustained. Leave was given to amend the bill.

THE COURT gave time to the defendants [Driggs & Cargill] to put in a voluntary, answer, and to file affidavits.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 F. Cas. 413, 6 McLean 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketchum-v-driggs-circtdmi-1853.