Ketchum v. Bourland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ketchum v. Bourland

145 S.W. 276, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 258

DecidedMarch 13, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.W. 276 (Ketchum v. Bourland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ketchum v. Bourland, 145 S.W. 276, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 258 (Tex. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

FLY, J.

F. G. Bourland sued appellant and G. N. Gibbens in tbe county court to recover of them $500, less a credit of $110, alleged to be due as purchase money for a horse, sorrel in color, “Crawford Sykes” by name, of distinguished lineage, and with “stocking legs.” On May 16, 1911, being Tuesday next after the third Monday of May, appellant and Gibbens failing- to appear, judgment by default was rendered against them, jointly and severally, for $390, with 6 per cent, interest from April 22, 1910. Gibbens applied for a writ of error to this court, and tbe judgment was affirmed as to him at a former day of this term of this court. 145 S. W. 274. Appellant, on May 22, 1911, filed bis motion for a new trial, on the ground that the service was void as to him, because the purported copy of the citation which was served on him cited him to appear on the third Monday in February, 1911, which was not the term of court to which the citation was returnable. The motion was overruled, and appellant perfected this appeal.

The original citation was in proper form, and had indorsed on the back of it: “No. 646, County Court, Uvalde County, May Term, 1911. Citation, F. G. Bourland v. G. N. Gib-bens, G. B. Ketchum. Issued 23d day of February, 1911. Zena Dalrymple, County Clerk.” The citation served on appellant was an exact copy of the original citation, except, as found by the county judge: “In the blank where the word ‘May’ was written in the original citation (and on which was the officer’s return) appears on the copy served on the defendant, according to his motion, as follows: ‘Febr May’ — one letter following the other in regular typewriter space lengths, the letters ‘Febr’ not being in as heavy type or so plain as the word ‘May,’ which was stamped or written in heavier and bolder type. Exhibit B of said motion was a certified and true copy of plaintiff’s petition, which showed that the same was filed February 23, 1911, and had written in the face thereof: ‘In the County Court of Uvalde County, Texas, May Term, 1911.’ ” The date of the filing of the suit was after the third Monday in February, and the citation was clear enough to indicate to appellant the term of court at which he should appear. The citation clearly, as found by the trial court, notified appellant to appear at the May term of the court, which was the “next regular term thereof,” as stated in the citation. The dimly written letters “Febr” did not obscure or render uncertain the plainly written word “May.”

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FLY, J.

F. G. Bourland sued appellant and G. N. Gibbens in tbe county court to recover of them $500, less a credit of $110, alleged to be due as purchase money for a horse, sorrel in color, “Crawford Sykes” by name, of distinguished lineage, and with “stocking legs.” On May 16, 1911, being Tuesday next after the third Monday of May, appellant and Gibbens failing- to appear, judgment by default was rendered against them, jointly and severally, for $390, with 6 per cent, interest from April 22, 1910. Gibbens applied for a writ of error to this court, and tbe judgment was affirmed as to him at a former day of this term of this court. 145 S. W. 274. Appellant, on May 22, 1911, filed bis motion for a new trial, on the ground that the service was void as to him, because the purported copy of the citation which was served on him cited him to appear on the third Monday in February, 1911, which was not the term of court to which the citation was returnable. The motion was overruled, and appellant perfected this appeal.

The original citation was in proper form, and had indorsed on the back of it: “No. 646, County Court, Uvalde County, May Term, 1911. Citation, F. G. Bourland v. G. N. Gib-bens, G. B. Ketchum. Issued 23d day of February, 1911. Zena Dalrymple, County Clerk.” The citation served on appellant was an exact copy of the original citation, except, as found by the county judge: “In the blank where the word ‘May’ was written in the original citation (and on which was the officer’s return) appears on the copy served on the defendant, according to his motion, as follows: ‘Febr May’ — one letter following the other in regular typewriter space lengths, the letters ‘Febr’ not being in as heavy type or so plain as the word ‘May,’ which was stamped or written in heavier and bolder type. Exhibit B of said motion was a certified and true copy of plaintiff’s petition, which showed that the same was filed February 23, 1911, and had written in the face thereof: ‘In the County Court of Uvalde County, Texas, May Term, 1911.’ ” The date of the filing of the suit was after the third Monday in February, and the citation was clear enough to indicate to appellant the term of court at which he should appear. The citation clearly, as found by the trial court, notified appellant to appear at the May term of the court, which was the “next regular term thereof,” as stated in the citation. The dimly written letters “Febr” did not obscure or render uncertain the plainly written word “May.”

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 S.W. 276, 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketchum-v-bourland-texapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack