Home/California Supreme Court/Ketchum v. Barber

Ketchum v. Barber

12 P. 251, 2 Cal. Unrep. 698
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 31, 1886
DocketNo. 11,423
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 P. 251 (Ketchum v. Barber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ketchum v. Barber, 12 P. 251, 2 Cal. Unrep. 698 (Cal. 1886).

Opinion

By the COURT.

The nonsuit was improperly granted. The deed to Henry Stull & Co. vested'the title in Henry Stull: Winter v. Stock, 29 Cal. 411, 412, 89 Am. Dec. 57. The answer shows a sufficient ouster.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Moore
34 P. 90 (California Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 P. 251, 2 Cal. Unrep. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketchum-v-barber-cal-1886.