Ketchmark v. Brown-Williamson Tobacco Corp.

CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 3, 2022
DocketCAAP-22-0000438
StatusPublished

This text of Ketchmark v. Brown-Williamson Tobacco Corp. (Ketchmark v. Brown-Williamson Tobacco Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ketchmark v. Brown-Williamson Tobacco Corp., (hawapp 2022).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 03-NOV-2022 09:55 AM Dkt. 20 ODSLJ NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

TRUMAN LEE KETCHMARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROWN-WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP.; ALL OTHER TOBACCO COMPANIES RESPONSIBLE, ET AL. [sic]; WASHINGTON STATE DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION; JIM SIVITS; MAKALA SIVITS; GOV. JAY INSLEE; LT. GOV. DENNY HECK; THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL. [sic]; MAKAHA SURFSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION (MSSCA) BOARD; HAWAII PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (HPM), ET AL. [sic]; and ALL OTHERS HURTING THE PLAINTIFF, NOT HELPING THE PLAINTIFF - BERNARD NEWBY; RICHARD PINKERTON; DALE WHITESIDES; DANICA DODD; JUDGE FONG; GARY GALIHER; T.C. KINART "TED"; LEONARD HELTZEL-"LONNIE"; DANIEL INOUYE AND HIS EMPLOYEES; DANIEL AKAKA AND ALL HIM [sic] EMPLOYEES; PATSY MINK AND ALL HER EMPLOYEES; NEIL ABERCROMBIE AND HIM [sic] EMPLOYEES; ANTHONY GUERRO AND HIS PARTNER; ATHERTON FOUNDATION; SAMUEL COOK FOUNDATION; WEYERHAUSER FOUNDATION; GOODYEAR FOUNDATION; BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION; ALAN KAY; DAVID EZRA; and COLETTE MACHADO, Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CC181000180)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and Chan, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal by self-represented Plaintiff- Appellant Truman Lee Ketchmark's appeal from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit's (Circuit Court) July 21, 2021 "Order of Dismissal [Rule 41(b)]" (Dismissal Order) because the Circuit Court has not reduced the Dismissal Order to an appealable final judgment. Hawaii Revised Statutes § 641-1(a) (2016); Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 58; Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(1994); Price v. Obayashi Hawaii Corp., 81 Hawai i 171, 176, 914 P.2d 1364, 1369 (1996) (applying the separate document rule to an order dismissing a complaint for want of prosecution). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that case number CAAP- XX-XXXXXXX is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, November 3, 2022.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Price v. Obayashi Hawaii Corp.
914 P.2d 1364 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1996)
Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright
869 P.2d 1334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ketchmark v. Brown-Williamson Tobacco Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketchmark-v-brown-williamson-tobacco-corp-hawapp-2022.