Ketchem v. Westran R-1 School District

231 S.W.3d 295, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1099, 2007 WL 2246634
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 7, 2007·No. No. ED 88986·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Scott Ketchem (“Spouse”) appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) that denied death benefits for his wife, Amanda Ketchem (“Deceased”). Spouse claims two points on appeal. First, Spouse claims that the Commission’s determination that Deceased was not in the course and scope of her employment is error. Second, Spouse contends that the Commission’s decision was the result of the improper and unconstitutional vote of a member of the Commission.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ketchem v. Westran R-1 School District, 231 S.W.3d 295, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1099, 2007 WL 2246634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

231 S.W.3d 295 (Ketchem v. Westran R-1 School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.