Ketchem v. Adler

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ketchem v. Adler

826 So. 2d 375, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9677, 2002 WL 1466277

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 10, 2002

DocketNo. 2D01-188

StatusPublished

This text of 826 So. 2d 375 (Ketchem v. Adler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ketchem v. Adler, 826 So. 2d 375, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9677, 2002 WL 1466277 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

BLUE, Chief Judge.

Sandra Ketchem appeals the adverse verdict in her medical malpractice action. The trial court’s decision is presumed correct and the burden is on Ms. Ketchem to demonstrate error. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Because we lack a complete trial transcript, we are required to affirm. We note that neither party requested, nor is entitled to, attorney’s fees for this appeal.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLUE, Chief Judge.

Sandra Ketchem appeals the adverse verdict in her medical malpractice action. The trial court’s decision is presumed correct and the burden is on Ms. Ketchem to demonstrate error. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). Because we lack a complete trial transcript, we are required to affirm. We note that neither party requested, nor is entitled to, attorney’s fees for this appeal.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT and COVINGTON, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

826 So. 2d 375, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9677, 2002 WL 1466277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ketchem-v-adler-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack