Ketcham v. Wilbur
177 N.E. 125, 256 N.Y. 525, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 1094
Opinion
Upon the record in this case, the trial judge was not required, if indeed he had the power, under a fair construction of the statute, to add interest to the verdict.
The question of the constitutionality of the statute is not involved or considered.
*526 The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ketcham v. Wilbur, 177 N.E. 125, 256 N.Y. 525, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 1094 (N.Y. 1931).
177 N.E. 125 (Ketcham v. Wilbur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bernard Katz, Inc. v. East 30th Street Corp.
172 Misc. 873 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Hanfeld v. A. Broido, Inc.
167 Misc. 85 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1938)
People v. Cherulnik
150 Misc. 527 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)