Ketcham v. Wilbur

New York Court of Appeals

Ketcham v. Wilbur

177 N.E. 125, 256 N.Y. 525, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 1094

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 24, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 177 N.E. 125 (Ketcham v. Wilbur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ketcham v. Wilbur, 177 N.E. 125, 256 N.Y. 525, 1931 N.Y. LEXIS 1094 (N.Y. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon the record in this case, the trial judge was not required, if indeed he had the power, under a fair construction of the statute, to add interest to the verdict.

The question of the constitutionality of the statute is not involved or considered.

*526 The order should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the negative.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI