Home/New York Court of Appeals/Ketcham v. . Sammis

Ketcham v. . Sammis

109 N.E. 1080, 215 N.Y. 644, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1066
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 1915·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Collin, Cuddebaok, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ketcham v. . Sammis, 109 N.E. 1080, 215 N.Y. 644, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1066 (N.Y. 1915).

109 N.E. 1080 (Ketcham v. . Sammis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.